Blog

Meet the IIU’s Behavioural Science Fellow: Michael Weiss

Impact Canada
Impact Canada, Impact & Innovation Unit, Privy Council Office
Michael Weiss
Published: 2023-03-07
Last modified: 2023-03-15

Dr. Michael

Submitted by tarab on

Michael is a Behavioural Science Fellow at the Impact and Innovation Unit, working on the Program of Applied Research on Climate Action in Canada (PARCA). His work focuses on the ongoing national survery of Canadians' attitudes, beliefs and action regarding climate change.

Prior to joining the IIU, Michael was a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Montreal. His academic work on music cognition explored the development of musical capacities using a variety of computational, behavioural, and neuroscientific methods.

Dr. Angela

Submitted by tarab on

Angela is a Behavioural Science Fellow with the Impact and Innovation Unit and the Public Health Agency of Canada. Her work is focused on risk communications, exploring topics such as vaccine confidence and public trust in government.

Angela has a Master’s degree in Behavioural Neuroscience from Wilfrid Laurier University. In 2021, she completed a Ph.D. in Behavioural Neuroscience from Wilfrid Laurier University, where she studied food behaviour and cravings.

Matthew

Submitted by tarab on

Matt is a Behavioural Science Fellow at the Impact and Innovation Unit of the Privy Council Office. He works with Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada to help accelerate the adoption of environmentally beneficial management practices in Canada's agriculture system.

Prior to joining the Fellowship, he worked at the Library of Parliament, where he provided custom research on social and economic issues to MPs and Senators. He has also spent time in a social innovation incubator, and as a program manager at an environmental non-profit.

Blog

Finding comfort with uncertainty

Journeying into unknowns of innovation

Nolan D'Souza, Challenge Fellow
Impact Canada, Impact & Innovation Unit, Privy Council Office
Nolan D'Souza

As a child, I remember wanting to be able to predict the future. Clairvoyance meant acing every test at school and winning the lottery countless times. At the time, I hadn’t realized that fortune telling is not a helpful superpower for daydreamers and trailblazers. Instead, leveraging uncertainty in work, as in life, is a catalyst for creativity — it certainly has been for me during this past year as a Challenge Fellow at Impact Canada. What exactly is uncertainty and how can we use it to innovate?

Uncertainty describes a situation that is understood well, including what causes it and the impact it will have. However, no trends nor patterns are available to predict how the situation will evolve. The more uncertainty the greater number of possible “futures”. These futures can be either favourable or unfavourable.

We cannot predict the future, but we can create it

A recent example of creativity emerging from uncertainty comes from the COVID-19 pandemic. A need for urgent problem solving was required to keep people safe, and the world operational, without knowing how the pandemic would evolve. Many people and businesses needed to find the flexibility to navigate an unpredictable future for their work, tools, or services. Even in sectors where change is historically slow due to the practice of extensive planning and the desire for certainty, novel solutions emerged rapidly to respond to the unpredictable times. For example, in many parts of Canada, the healthcare sector placed an emphasis on keeping COVID-19 case rates low but required the flexibility to explore ways to do so as the pandemic evolved. The experience resulted in new models of care, digital tools, and health services — all of which continue to develop for other health aspects, even from innovators who never previously worked in the sector. It is a perfect case for the power of uncertainty: embracing it does not mean lacking direction and accepting all potential future states. Instead, it means having a very clear direction towards a subset of those future states where a clearly defined problem is solved, or a clear goal is achieved.

All roads lead to Rome” you just might not know which one to take

The conditions for using uncertainty in innovation

Even the most creative people in the world need a focal point from which to build their ideas. Challenges, such as those launched through Impact Canada, similarly are a focal point for open innovation competitions. They provide prize funding to a broad range of innovators by defining specific criteria and requirements, directing them to explore many possibilities (including non-traditional ones) that will achieve certain outcomes for desired future states. I have been lucky to support the development of the most recent Impact Canada Challenge, the Type 2 Diabetes Prevention Challenge (T2DP), launched by the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC). After an extensive research and consultation phase, gathering subject matter and lived experience advice, along with data to support what could be the most impactful outcomes for Canada, the T2DP goal was narrowed down to focus on finding ways to remove persisting health and social barriers that lead to an increased risk for type 2 diabetes. These barriers are different depending on the community in Canada, and thus there cannot be one overarching problem to solve but various problems experienced by each community. As a result, a Grand Challenge approach has been used to guide innovators to incorporate Challenge principles that can build on the strengths of a community to help prevent type 2 diabetes (such as by reducing stigma or increasing human-centered care). It allows innovators to create new approaches for prevention or adapt something that already exists in order to reach the Challenge goal.

Defining success matters when navigating uncertainty. Challenges set goals that are broad enough for innovators to adapt to a situation as they refine their approach or solution, but are clear enough to achieve the desired outcome. In addition, Challenges often provide supports outside of prize funding to accelerate transforming ideas into innovation, pushing participants further along towards success. Both the funder and the innovators have to embrace uncertainty, being open to multiple opportunities, events, and ideas. They work towards a successful future in lieu of a meticulously planned one. The approach allows veering off the tried and tested paths which only produce already known results and ideas, but do nothing to address persisting problems.

A problem well defined is half solved
- Charles Kettering

Uncertainty does not mean risky business

Embracing uncertainty isn’t the acceptance of risk, which is the possibility of loss and is measurable unlike uncertainty. To innovate means limiting losses while exploring and testing uncertainty. Challenges carefully define goals and parameters for innovators to operate within, so the risks are minimal when experimenting with what might work to achieve a goal and it’s easy to pivot to a solution that works. They create the conditions for a nothing to lose experimentation approach, using uncertain possibilities for potentially huge pay-offs. For example, at all stages of the T2DP Challenge, there will be benefits for PHAC, for innovators, and ultimately for people communities in Canada from sharing ideas and exploring different ways to prevent type 2 diabetes. The benefits can include, but are not limited to, new partnerships and opportunities to collaborate, new organizations becoming active in diabetes prevention and shared ways of understanding, measuring or responding to being at risk for type 2 diabetes. Endeavours like Challenges, de-risk the act of breaking out of a pattern of reproducing known successes which limits creative exploration.

Uncertainty is the only certainty there is, and knowing how to live with insecurity is the only security
- John Allen Paulos

The unknown does not have to be scary

Working with uncertainty can be scary but doesn’t have to be. I am 100% certain of my uncertain future and it doesn’t scare me. In fact, when people talk about “future proofing” I like to think of it as working towards only the parts of the ideal future that meet our goals. All the other parts will fall into place even if we don’t quite know how. Believe me — I’m still no clairvoyant but it’s worked out very creatively for me.

Published: 2023-02-14
Last modified: 2025-05-23
Case Study

Case Study: Women in Cleantech Challenge

Driving the Clean Energy Economy with Female-led Innovation

Natural Resources Canada
Impact Canada, Impact & Innovation Unit, Privy Council Office
Female scientist working in a lab

1. Introduction

1.1 About Natural Resources Canada (NRCan)

NRCan is a science-based department that works to advance the prosperity of Canada’s natural resource sectors. The Department supports the sustainable development of Canada’s natural resources through world-class research and evidence-informed policy and programs, including domestic and international engagement and in collaboration with Indigenous peoples in Canada.

1.2 About the Office of Energy Research and Development (OERD)

OERD leads the Government of Canada’s efforts in delivering energy research, development, and demonstrating (RD&D) funding, accelerating efforts in energy innovation and clean technology (“cleantech”) programming. Leveraging over forty years of experience and unique science and technology expertise, OERD invests in thirteen federal departments and agencies to undertake RD&D, as well as a wide range of Canadian small and medium enterprises, utilities, industry, and other firms, all in support of Canada’s energy innovation and climate change goals.

OERD led the Cleantech stream of Impact Canada Challenges, with a $75M portfolio of six unique Challenges. Through the Cleantech stream, NRCan experimented with different challenge designs while striving to maximize the program’s overall impact across the natural resources sector. As one of the first departments to launch Impact Challenges, NRCan’s program team has developed a unique perspective on how innovative funding mechanisms can be applied in different contexts to ensure greatest impact. Ultimately, NRCan hopes to take the lessons learned and best practices from this experience and apply it to future programing, while also aiming to support learning across the federal system by sharing insights from the NRCan Impact model with other departments considering the development of challenge portfolios.

1.3 About Impact Canada

Impact Canada, situated within the Privy Council Office, uses novel public policy methods to address identified gaps in effectively translating policy objectives into meaningful and measurable outcomes for Canadians. The Impact and Innovation Unit, which manages Impact Canada, is working to close the gap between policy development and implementation, by actioning high-level policy commitments and working on design, implementation, and assessment. It delivers on its mandate through the deployment of two main lines of business: Impact Canada Challenges and Impact Canada applied behavioural science and advanced policy research.

Impact Canada Challenges focus on more effectively deploying grants and contributions funding – a traditionally under-optimized, yet highly influential government lever – shifting from paying for expenditures or activities to rewarding the achievement of outcomes, not outputs. Impact Canada Challenges use financial and non-financial incentives to encourage participants to tackle well defined problems where solutions are not apparent or current responses are not achieving the desired results.

1.4 Why the Women in Cleantech Challenge?

In 2017, when this Challenge was under development, only 5% of tech companies in Canada were founded by women. The lack of female representation in science and technology oriented industries was clearly exemplified in the #movethedial11 report on women in Canada’s innovation community. It was reported that only 13% of companies have female representation at the executive level, and 73% of company boards have no female representation at all. These statistics were even more pronounced in the cleantech sector.

Similarly, in a 2018 survey of 350 startups, the Boston Consulting Group reported that female entrepreneurs raised an average of just under $1 million in early-stage capital, less than half the funds raised by men. The authors found that “the disparity in the funding is not due to qualitative differences in pitches or underlying businesses.” In fact, startups run by women performed much better, returning 78 cents per dollar of investment during their early years of operation compared with just 31 cents for those run by men.22

The Government of Canada recognizes that the gender gap, particularly in areas of innovation, is inhibiting economic growth by leaving a portion of the skilled talent untapped. To solve the complex problems we face as a country, we need to rely on the diversity, ingenuity, and creativity of all Canadians – and not simply those who have traditionally contributed to solutions. This means encouraging the active participation of non-traditional solvers, including those who have been excluded from participation, and those who didn’t know they had a seat at the table. It means increasing general societal awareness of the challenges needing solving, actively engaging citizens through more effective collaboration and co-creation, and partnering with civil society to magnify results. Lastly, it means that innovation can do more than just drive economic growth; it can also meaningfully address key societal challenges like climate change and social inclusion – all at the same time. In response to the growing recognition that diversity is essential to building economic resilience, NRCan launched the Women in Cleantech Challenge in 2018 in collaboration with Toronto’s MaRS Discovery District.

Composite images of Challenge finalists and jury members

2. Competition Overview

2.1 Driving the Clean Energy Economy with Female-led Innovation

The Women in Cleantech Challenge was designed to have a meaningful impact on the underrepresentation of women in Canada’s cleantech sector by supporting a cohort of entrepreneurs with the financial, business, and technical resources they need to be globally competitive. It set sights on leveling the playing field for women innovators, and increasing awareness of the key role women must play in tackling some of the greatest energy and environmental challenges that face society, while also inspiring the next generation of female cleantech entrepreneurs.

Following a national call that saw nearly 150 top female innovators from across Canada apply to the Challenge, an expert selection process chose six women to participate in an intensive 3-year program culminating in a $1-million grand prize for the finalist judged to have made the most progress in advancing their technology and growing their business.

2.2 Challenge Objectives

The following four main objectives encompassed this Challenge:

  • Seek out the best, most driven women innovators tackling some of the biggest global problems with a significant potential for impact.
  • Leverage existing federal research assets and networks of expertise, maximizing use of existing public resources to accelerate advancement of the entrepreneurs’ R&D.
  • Build support for the women’s success – via a curated mix of mentorship, educational programming and access to market intelligence through MaRS Discovery District.
  • Make timely connections and provide access to investors and corporate partners early in the start-up and business development stage.

2.3 Participation Criteria

Applicants needed to be:

  • A female, Canadian citizen or permanent resident of Canada, lead innovator and project lead, with a business venture that was, or could be, registered as a Canadian corporation.
  • Prepared to participate in an intensive 3 year public-facing competition that includes frequent travel, meetings and lab visits, including significant time in MaRS Discovery District’s entrepreneurship and business support programs, workshops and events in Toronto, Ontario.
  • Working within the defined “cleantech” field on a technology that is proprietary and/or patentable, and falls within levels 2-5 of the nine-point Technology Readiness Level (TRL) spectrum.

2.4 Key Challenge Stages and Judging Criteria

left to right: Jennifer Ramsey, Janie C. Béïque and Margaret Atwood.

Within the Impact Canada Challenge framework, challenges may be designed to follow stage-gates or filters, like the Women in Cleantech Challenge. These provide opportunities to select and filter the best ideas and provide more intensive support (both financial and non-financial) to an increasingly refined group of competitors. This structure aims to influence and improve the quality of the solutionsproduced. Stage-gates are particularly useful for Challenges that aim to support innovators at an early stage of product development, or start-up businesses in need of seed capital to kick-start the work33.

  • Screening and Selection

    • 148 applications from across Canada were received.
    • An evaluation committee narrowed down applicants to a “short list” of 33 individuals.
    • Committee members conducted right fit interviews to assess the impact of the technology, fit with federal labs, and the ability of the entrepreneur to meet the requirements of the program.
    • At the end of this stage, ten semi-finalists were selected to pitch at a live event at MaRS in Toronto.
  • Pitch Competition

    • Ten women representing a variety of ethnicities, ages, and technology areas pitched their ideas to a jury in front of 500 attendees from the cleantech ecosystem including partners, investors, educational institutes, corporate partners, and media.
    • To select the finalists that would continue in the program, the jury used a pre-determined evaluation method that focused on the disruptive or visionary nature of the innovation, the probability of its commercial success, and its potential to scale globally and reduce harmful impacts on the environment or climate.
    • Ultimately, six finalists were selected to participate in the intensive 3-year accelerator program and compete for a $1-million grand prize.
  • Incubation Period: Product & Business Development

    During the 3-year incubation period, finalists each received:

    • An annual stipend of $115,000 so they could work full time on their ventures
    • Over $300,000 of expert advice and business development support provided by MaRS
    • Up to $250,000 in federal lab support to de-risk their technology

    Over that time, finalists:

    • Participated in intensive entrepreneurship workshops to enhance their business acumen.
    • Were each matched to a personal mentor, business and technical advisors to advance their company development.
    • Participated in regular showcasing events with investors, corporate and potential partners.
    • Leveraged the scientific expertise of federal laboratories to significantly advance their technologies through collaborative R&D projects.
  • Winner Selected and Announced!

    • The $1-million grand prize was awarded to the finalist who demonstrated the most significant progress in developing their business and technology with a potential for significant scale and impact.
    • The selection was carried out using a mix of criteria, including a pre-determined evaluation method based on performance metrics monitored and accrued over the 3-year incubation period, and an independent jury panel’s assessment.
    • The winner was announced at the Challenge Finale, which was hosted by MaRS on November 30, 2021 at the MaRS Climate Impact Conference.

3. Design Features and Outcomes

3.1 Key Design Features

Throughout the Challenge design and implementation phases, a singular focus on outcomes ensured that decisions were made to maximize impact for the entrepreneurs. The key goals of the Women in Cleantech Challenge were to level the playing field for six high-potential women innovators, and to inspire an emerging generation of women in fields of clean technology entrepreneurship. All design decisions were made in service of these outcomes, and built around three pillars of support: business, technical, and financial. These created the backbone of support mechanisms that worked together to incubate the six business ventures that were selected to participate in the Challenge.

  • Strategic Partnership

    Knowing that collaboration would be the key to achieving results for a Challenge with such broad objectives, NRCan decided to work with MaRS to leverage their strengths in cleantech business development and complement NRCan’s science, technology and program expertise. NRCan opted for a third-party delivery agent model to facilitate this, and to ensure sustained access to MaRS resources for the duration of the Challenge. Collaborating with MaRS allowed the finalists to receive high-caliber training and advisory support, while effectively tapping into a broader innovation ecosystem and investor network. It also facilitated early engagement between MaRS and other key stakeholders, such as Écotech Québec, to further support Challenge activities. MaRS leveraged its deep roots in the global cleantech ecosystem to deliver bespoke training, access to a vast network of advisors and investors, and numerous thoughtfully curated opportunities. The finalists were also prominently featured at global innovation and investment events, such as the 2019 Clean Energy Ministerial, Mission Innovation, EDC’s Cleantech Export Week, and 2021 MaRS Climate Impact Week. MaRS’ strong networks allowed for the Challenge to have a bigger and more public presence, including the recruitment of a prominent judging panel with powerhouse women: Janie C. Béïque, Elicia Maine, Humera Malik, Jennifer Ramsey, and internationally acclaimed Canadian author, Margaret Atwood.

  • Technical Collaboration

    As a complement to the MaRS curated business development curriculum, the Challenge offered access to federal laboratory facilities and expertise, with the aim of furthering technology development and accelerating market readiness. Through NRCan, finalists were able to work with world class federal research labs to test, improve, and de-risk their technologies with collaborative R&D projects. These projects were carried out through an NRCan mechanism known as the Science and Technology Assistance for Cleantech (STAC). The STAC model supports organizations with capacity gaps, such as those with limited research infrastructure, technical expertise or cash flow constraints that would impede an organization’s ability to advance their technology or service to market. This unique mechanism can be an especially powerful support for small and medium sized enterprises in that there are no direct costs to the organization for the collaborative R&D project. In this way, Challenge finalists were able to collaborate with the federal laboratories and their scientists, which are known for their vast and specialized expertise in applied science and exceptionally well positioned to work through the challenging stages of pilot testing and scaling up technologies.

  • Annual Stipend

    Enabling the entrepreneurs to focus all of their time and attention on growing their businesses was a priority for the Challenge, and for this reason an annual living stipend was another important design feature and one of the financial support mechanisms finalists received. This element enabled the cohort to put their best efforts into nurturing their ventures, but also ensured that there was an even playing field across the finalists. It allowed the finalists to put full-time effort into their business venture goals and have singular focus by minimizing competing priorities, which is very different from the reality of what most entrepreneurs face when growing their businesses. Ultimately, the annual stipend was highly regarded by the entrepreneurs as one of the key benefits to the Challenge.

3.2 Insight on Outcomes

  • Enhanced Public Awareness of a Problem or Issue

    While a Challenge has the potential to attract non-traditional solvers to a problem, it cannot do so without significant promotion and marketing campaigns that engage networks beyond those targeted by traditional government programming. The Challenge was made visible through a number of channels, including email blasts to MaRS Cleantech lists, targeted social media advertisements, blog posts, a piece in The Globe and Mail, video footage posted across social media platforms, and organic social posts. Additionally, the partnership between NRCan and MaRS meant that the Challenge benefitted from cross promotion of social media posts and communications, which amplified the messaging and garnered additional public attention. These efforts resulted in widespread engagement, both at the launch of the Challenge and for the finale. The number of applicants exceeded expectations by 87%, and dedicated web platforms and social media received above average views and re-shares in comparison to traditional government initiatives. Lastly, another factor that cannot be overlooked is that the Women in Cleantech Challenge was about increasing representation in the innovation ecosystem, at a time when equity, diversity and inclusion were increasingly in the public eye. This was another reason that the program quickly garnered public support and awareness, and allowed for high levels of engagement throughout the duration of the Challenge.

  • New Talent Mobilized

    The Challenge sought to mobilize new talent to address the under-representation of women in the cleantech industry. Using an open approach with low initial barriers to entry, it encouraged broad participation and enticed non-traditional entrants who might have had limited experience participating in traditional government grants and contributions programs. This enabled the Challenge to attract talented applicants and semi-finalists of diverse ethnicities, ages, and technology areas.

  • Increased Skill and Capacity

    The Challenge effectively addressed key barriers to women’s success in a coordinated and complementary fashion by assembling training and support components into a comprehensive package. Bundling these elements together significantly reduced the burden on participants, who would otherwise have needed to assemble them on their own. For example, the finalists received negotiation training through MaRS, and were then able to apply those skills and gain experience using them by negotiating contracts with collaborators or investors. The integrated program created the opportunity to learn, put that learning into action, and improve through iterative feedback loops. Ultimately, the finalists who were excellent technical leaders were now able to focus on becoming excellent business leaders as well.

    Furthermore, the program’s design also enabled capacity increases at MaRS. As an organization, MaRS gained additional experience supporting women entrepreneurs and created strong networks in a challenge or Accelerator framework. This new expertise can be utilized in future MaRS programming to impart long term social benefits for Canada – and in fact, this is already underway!

  • Increased Economic Return

    Through the entrepreneurial training provided by MaRS, the potential for the finalists to attract private investment was significantly increased. Not only were finalists able to meet with targeted investors, corporates and potential partners, they also received training on how to effectively deliver pitches and were provided the opportunity to receive feedback on their delivery. These opportunities all played a role in accelerating the growth of the cohort that allowed the finalists to make significant business development headway. At the end of the Challenge, the cohort collectively raised $52.5 million in funding, and the number of paid employees grew from a total of 10 to 82.5, which represents a 725% increase.

  • Public Sector Innovation

    The Challenge has been an effective and innovative funding approach to tackle high priority issues for the Government of Canada and society. It was well-timed in that it launched during a period of increased federal attention to gender inequality, and a growing interest and comfort with the use of innovative funding mechanisms. The 2018 Federal Budget had an unprecedented focus on advancing gender equality in Canada, and introduced the Government’s new Gender Results Framework which highlighted key gender equality goals for Canada, including Education and Skills Development, Economic Participation and Prosperity, which are particularly relevant to this Challenge. This has undoubtedly channeled greater support and increased attention across the Government and innovation ecosystems.

    At the same time, the federal government advanced the use of innovative funding mechanisms and championed greater experimentation. This included Impact Canada’s set of horizontal Terms and Conditions for transfer payments, which provided enhanced flexibility to NRCan to pursue innovative program delivery using Challenges. It also included the STAC collaboration mechanism, which at the time was a first of kind model pioneered by OERD. Approval of the STAC model was a significant achievement, as traditionally the Transfer Payment Policy was interpreted to prevent collaborative R&D projects between federal laboratories and recipients of Grants and Contributions.

3.3 Unexpected Outcomes

Women in Cleantech Challenge finalists sitting together and smiling
  • The Ultimate Collaborative Network: the “Cohort Effect”

    Perhaps one of the main reasons behind the success of the entrepreneurs and their business ventures was the unanticipated “cohort effect” that came about during the Challenge. The cohort had an undeniably collaborative spirit, one where the relationships were built on strong mutual support, sharing of knowledge, and the reinforcement and amplification of each other’s work. This team approach for a prize-based competition was not only remarkable, but also created massive benefits for the entire cohort. Some of the Challenge design features that could have played a role in enabling this effect include:

    • The business ventures were all at similar development stages because eligible businesses had to be within a defined TRL range.
    • The scope of the Challenge was broad enough to allow each venture to develop different technology that would not necessarily compete with each other’s target markets.
    • The finalists had an even playing ground in that they received an annual living stipend that allowed them to make their business growth a full-time priority and maximize the use of the business support mechanisms curated for them by MaRS.

    Ultimately, the “cohort effect” was a powerful mechanism that transformed the experiences of the individual finalists. It was even noted by the finalists as potentially being more valuable than the grand prize money at stake at the end of the Challenge.

  • Private Sector Investment

    Building on the success of the Women in Cleantech Challenge program model, MaRS launched the RBC Women in Cleantech Accelerator (the “Accelerator”) in 2021. The Accelerator’s goal is to continue increasing female representation in Canada’s clean technology innovation economy, by recruiting new entrepreneurs to participate in future cohorts. The curriculum for the Accelerator was designed based on feedback from MaRS’ experts and the Women in Cleantech Challenge finalists and leverages the enhanced public profile of the Women in Cleantech Challenge. The continuation of Women in Cleantech funded by private sector investment is a testament to the true success of the Challenge, signaling that there is and can be an alignment between public and private sector goals. It also demonstrates the beginning of ripple effects of the Challenge and how it has impacted our views of the innovation ecosystem and the role that women need to play in it.

4. Meet the Finalists and Grand Prize Winner

Amanda Hall, Grand Prize Winner

Summit Nanotech

Summit Nanotech has developed an innovative method of lithium-ion extraction from produced brine water, having the potential to revolutionize both the mining and energy-storage sector. The approach creates an inexpensive and sustainable source of green lithium for batteries used in electric vehicles, portable devices and mobile gadgets, all of which are fast-growing, multibillion-dollar markets. Summit Nanotech was awarded the Solar Impulse Efficient Solution Label, has been named by Corporate Knights as one of the 50 fastest-growing green companies in Canada, and most recently closed US$50 million in Series A2 funding.

Support in the cleantech ecosystem for women is growing stronger every day. There are opportunities in various incubators and acceleration platforms, but beyond this your fellow female cleantech CEOs will catch you before you fall.

Amanda Hall, Founder and CEO of Summit Nanotech

Evelyn Allen

Evercloak

Evercloak uses an energy-efficient and affordable process to develop nanofilms and nanocoatings. The films significantly reduce the energy required for commercial and residential air conditioning and are often used in cleantech applications, including water purification, energy storage, corrosion prevention, sensing, and smart packaging. In 2021, Evercloak engaged in a $4.5M collaboration with Environmental Systems Corp.

The Women in Cleantech Challenge was the launch pad for Evercloak, inspiring me to make the leap to entrepreneurship. The tailored mentoring and access to federal labs to scale Evercloak’s technology has equipped me with tools to accelerate our growth.

Evelyn Allen, Co-founder and CEO of Evercloak

Julie Angus

Open Ocean Robotics

Open Ocean Robotics designs and builds autonomous solar-powered boats that collect real-time data on emissions, oil spills, and other risks to the ocean. Julie’s goal is to create a ‘digital ocean’ to connect and exchange ocean data. Julie is a recipient of the British Columbia Cleantech Industry Icon Award and more recently, Open Ocean Robotics was awarded ventureLAB’s Company of the Year Award.

Cleantech entrepreneurship offers incredible opportunities to improve our planet's sustainability, create economic prosperity and advance technological innovations. To achieve these things we need diversity and more women to pursue STEM fields and take leadership roles in driving change.

Julie Angus, CEO of Open Ocean Robotics

Nivatha Balendra

Dispersa

Dispersa has harnessed a bacterial process to produce biodegradable biosurfactants — active agents that are used in a variety of products today. Dispersa’s non-toxic, palm-oil free biosurfactants can be readily integrated into end-user formulations, such as cleaning products, detergents, and cosmetics. Recently, Dispersa has been selected as a SheEO Venture Semi-Finalist in Canada.

Creating an impactful sustainable difference through innovation has always been a dream of mine. The Challenge helped transform my vision into reality by providing an incredible amount of curated support and resources necessary to transition from an idea I had as an undergrad into the growing cleantech venture Dispersa is today.

Nivatha Balendra, Founder and CEO of Dispersa

Alexandra Tavasoli

Solistra

Solistra developed a technology that converts CO2 and methane into clean carbon products. The approach could prove a powerful, energy-efficient way to turn CO2 captured from power plants or the atmosphere into clean chemicals and fuels. In 2019, Alexandra was named a top 30 under 30 sustainable leader in Corporate Knights magazine. More recently, Alexandra has taken on a postdoctoral associate role at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

As a PhD engineer, it has been invaluable to learn about the broader cleantech ecosystem, business practices and strategies, and the economics of technology commercialization. I have been able to broaden my STEM career, since STEM in isolation cannot solve the world’s problems — a more holistic approach is required.

Alexandra Tavasoli, Former CEO of Solistra

Luna Yu

Genecis Bioindustries

Genecis has developed a solution that converts organic waste into a polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) based bioplastic. PHA bioplastics are fully biodegradable in marine and terrestrial environments and can be used in traditional plastic applications such as packaging films, bags, containers, utensils, and other items. Genecis is one of the youngest teams to receive a multimillion-dollar grant from Sustainable Development Technology Canada. More recently, Genecis announced that it has raised US$7 million in Series A funding led by Khosla Ventures and BDC Capital’s Cleantech Practice.

The Women in Cleantech Challenge has not only navigated our company out of an innovation ‘Valley of Death’ and played an instrumental role in our success but, most importantly, it demonstrated that there is no longer a ceiling to what women pursuing a career in cleantech can do.

Luna Yu, CEO of Genecis

The Women in Cleantech Challenge continues to attract scale-up investments even after its conclusion!

In November 2021, Amanda Hall of Summit Nanotech was awarded the $1M grand prize. The competition tasked six first-time women entrepreneurs with scaling their startups over the course of more than three years.

  • March 2022: CAD$17.8M Series A Funding co-led by Xora Innovation, Capricorn’s Technology Impact Fund along with BHP Ventures
  • July 2022: CAD$1.8M Seed Funding approved by Sustainable Development Technology Canada
  • Jan 2023: Close of US$50M Series A2, led by Evok Innovations and BDC Capital's Climate Tech Fund and joined by Capricorn Investment Group, Xora Innovation, NGP, Volta Energy Technologies, Helios Climate Ventures and The Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment.

5. Conclusion

Designing and delivering a Challenge is a process of continual reflection, learning and adaptation. Every Challenge is unique and it’s impossible to predict and plan for all potential outcomes in advance, so there is no single script to follow. The delivery teams at NRCan and MaRS were constantly tracking progress, considering how the Challenge could be improved in potential future iterations, and exploring how the learnings could be applied in different contexts. A Challenge is an opportunity to try new things and to consider innovative solutions to better service intended outcomes.

In order to solve the complex problems we face as a country, we need to rely on the diversity, ingenuity, and creativity of all Canadians – and not simply those who have traditionally contributed to solutions. This means encouraging the active participation of non-traditional solvers, including those who have been excluded from participation, and those who didn’t know they had a seat at the table. It means increasing general societal awareness of the challenges needing solving, actively engaging citizens through more effective collaboration and co-creation, and partnering with civil society to magnify results. Lastly, it means that innovation can do more than just drive economic growth; it can also meaningfully address key societal challenges like climate change and social inclusion – all at the same time. By being thoughtful in program design decisions, social, environmental, and economic outcomes can all be equally addressed rather than being mutually exclusive of one another.

By maintaining ongoing engagement with aspiring cleantech entrepreneurs, the successful Women in Cleantech Challenge has the potential to lead to long term benefits to Canadians. It is NRCan’s hope that the Challenge will continue to inspire the next generation of women innovators for years to come and its ripple effects will work toward closing the gender gap as we know it.

5.1 Other Relevant Case Studies on the Women In Cleantech Challenge: